Data And Safety Monitoring Board Research Articles

Leaflet modification before transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients at risk for coronary obstruction: the ShortCut study.

This trial sought to assess the safety and efficacy of ShortCut, the first dedicated leaflet modification device, prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients at risk for coronary artery obstruction. This pivotal prospective study enrolled patients with failed bioprosthetic aortic valves scheduled to undergo TAVI and were at risk for coronary artery obstruction. The primary safety endpoint was procedure-related mortality or stroke at discharge or 7 days, and the primary efficacy endpoint was per-patient leaflet splitting success. Independent angiographic, echocardiographic, and computed tomography core laboratories assessed all images. Safety events were adjudicated by a clinical events committee and data safety monitoring board. Sixty eligible patients were treated (77.0 ± 9.6 years, 70% female, 96.7% failed surgical bioprosthetic valves, 63.3% single splitting and 36.7% dual splitting) at 22 clinical sites. Successful leaflet splitting was achieved in all (100%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 94-100.0%, p<0.001) patients. Procedure time, including imaging confirmation of leaflet splitting, was 30.6 ± 17.9 min. Freedom from the primary safety endpoint was achieved in 59 (98.3%; 95% CI [91.1-100%]) patients, with no mortality and one (1.7%) disabling stroke. At 30 days, freedom from coronary obstruction was 95% (95% CI 86.1-99.0%). Within 90 days, freedom from mortality was 95% (95% CI 86.1-99.0%]), without any cardiovascular deaths. Modification of failed bioprosthetic aortic valve leaflets using ShortCut was safe, achieved successful leaflet splitting in all patients, and was associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients at risk for coronary obstruction undergoing TAVI.

Schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression: study protocol for a parallel group randomized clinical trial (DEPRE-ST)

BackgroundAbout one third of patients with depression are in a condition that can be termed as “difficult-to-treat”. Some evidence suggests that difficult-to-treat depression is associated with a higher frequency of childhood trauma and comorbid personality disorders or accentuated features. However, the condition is understudied, and the effects of psychotherapy for difficult-to-treat depression are currently uncertain. The aim of this trial is to investigate the beneficial and harmful effects of 30 sessions of individual schema therapy versus treatment as usual for difficult-to-treat depression in the Danish secondary, public mental health sector.MethodsIn this randomized, multi-centre, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial, 129 outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression will be randomized (1:1) to 30 sessions of individual schema therapy or treatment as usual; in this context mainly group-based, short-term cognitive behaviour or psychodynamic therapy. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in depressive symptoms 12 months after randomization, measured on the observer-rated 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The secondary outcomes are health-related quality of life assessed with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version, functional impairment assessed with the Work and Social Adjustment Scale, psychological wellbeing assessed with the WHO-5 Well-being Index, and negative effects of treatment assessed with the Negative Effects Questionnaire. Exploratory outcomes are improvement on patient self-defined outcomes, personal recovery, anxiety symptoms, anger reactions, metacognitive beliefs about anger, and perseverative negative thinking. Outcomes will be assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months after randomization; the 12-month time-point being the primary time-point of interest. Outcome assessors performing the depression-rating, data managers, statisticians, the data safety and monitoring committee, and conclusion makers for the outcome article will be blinded to treatment allocation and results. To assess cost-effectiveness of the intervention, a health economic analysis will be performed.DiscussionThis trial will provide evidence on the beneficial and harmful effects, as well as the cost-effectiveness of schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression. The results can potentially improve treatment for a large and understudied patient group.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05833087. Registered on 15th April 2023 (approved without prompts for revision on 27th April 2023).

Nivolumab plus ONC201 plus in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients: a Brown University Oncology Research Group phase Ib/II study (BrUOG379).

Immune checkpoint inhibitors alone, or in combination with chemotherapy failed to provide meaningful clinical activity for patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC). ONC201 is a small molecule that inactivates AKT and ERK signaling and actives the TRAIL pathway. Preclinical studies indicated potential benefits of combining ONC201 with checkpoint inhibitors. This is a phase Ib/II trial of ONC201 plus nivolumab for patient with MSS CRC who progressed on standard treatment. Enrolled patients received ONC201 plus nivolumab in a dose de-escalation fashion to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose-expansion cohort. ONC201 at a dose of 625 mg was given orally at day -7 of cycle 1, followed by weekly dosing. Nivolumab was given every 2 weeks at 240 mg IV starting on day 1 of every cycle (cycle =28 days). The primary end point was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the observation window (run-in dose day -7, cycle 1 to assessment pre-dosing cycle 2). The plan was to enroll 28 additional patients at the MTD so that a total of 34 patients would be treated at the MTD. Pharmacokinetics (PKs) and tumor biopsies were collected at several time points per study protocol. A total of 13 patients (8 patients in the dose escalation *6 evaluable*) were enrolled between December 4, 2019 and March 2021. All patients had received ≥2 previous lines of chemotherapy and had confirmed microsatellite stability or mismatch repair-proficient tumors. No DLTs were observed with 625 mg ONC201 in the first three patients. Three additional patients were enrolled at the same dose to confirm safety. Two patients progressed during the DLT period and had to be replaced. During the dose-expansion part, five patients were enrolled and none required dose reduction or modification. No objective tumor response was observed in the 13 treated patients. Disease progression was confirmed at the time of the first imaging evaluation at 8 weeks following cycle 2. Post discussion at the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) on May 25, 2021, the principal investigator (PI) and Committee voted to close the study to new patient enrollment prior to reaching accrual of 34 patients, secondary to lack of efficacy. In this study of patients with advanced MSS CRC, combination ONC201/nivolumab was well-tolerated; objective responses to ONC201/nivolumab were not observed.

Personalized, Precision Medicine to Cure Alzheimer's Dementia: Approach #1.

The goal of the treatment for Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is the cure of dementia. A literature review revealed 18 major elements causing AD and 29 separate medications that address them. For any individual with AD, one is unlikely to discern which major causal elements produced dementia. Thus, for personalized, precision medicine, all causal elements must be treated so that each individual patient will have her or his causal elements addressed. Twenty-nine drugs cannot concomitantly be administered, so triple combinations of drugs taken from that list are suggested, and each triple combination can be administered sequentially, in any order. Ten combinations given over 13 weeks require 2.5 years, or if given over 26 weeks, they require 5.0 years. Such sequential treatment addresses all 18 elements and should cure dementia. In addition, any comorbid risk factors for AD whose first presence or worsening was within ±1 year of when AD first appeared should receive appropriate, standard treatment together with the sequential combinations. The article outlines a randomized clinical trial that is necessary to assess the safety and efficacy of the proposed treatments; it includes a triple-drug Rx for equipoise. Clinical trials should have durations of both 2.5 and 5.0 years unless the data safety monitoring board (DSMB) determines earlier success or futility since it is uncertain whether three or six months of treatment will be curative in humans, although studies in animals suggest that the briefer duration of treatment might be effective and restore defective neural tracts.

Training the Next Generation of Data Monitoring Committee Members: An Initiative of the HeartFailure Collaboratory.

Clinical trials are vital for assessing therapeutic interventions. The associated data monitoring committees (DMCs) safeguard patient interests and enhance trial integrity, thus promoting timely, reliable evaluations of those interventions. We face an urgent need to recruit and train new DMC members. The HeartFailure Collaboratory (HFC), a multidisciplinary public-private consortium of academics, trialists, patients, industry representatives, and government agencies, is working to improve the clinical trial ecosystem. The HFC aims to improve clinical trial efficiency and quality by standardizing concepts, and to help meet the demand for experienced individuals on DMCs by creating a standardized approach to training new members. This paper discusses the HFC's training workshop, and an apprenticeship model for new DMC members. It describes opportunities and challenges DMCs face, along with common myths and best practices learned through previous experiences, with an emphasis on data confidentiality and need for quality independent statistical reporting groups.

Aspin: neurosurgical aspirin intervention prognostic study — perioperative continuation versus discontinuation of aspirin in lumbar spinal surgery, a randomized controlled, noninferiority trial

RationaleAspirin is typically discontinued in cranial and spinal surgery because of the increased risk of hemorrhagic complications, but comes together with the risk of resulting in an increase of cardiac and neurologic thrombotic perioperative events.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate the non-inferiority of perioperative continuation of aspirin patients undergoing low complex lumbar spinal surgery, compared with the current policy of perioperative discontinuation of aspirin.Study designA randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups of 277 cases (554 in total).Study populationPatients undergoing low complex lumbar spinal surgery and using aspirin. All patients are aged >18 years.InterventionPeri-operative continuation of aspirin.Study outcomesPrimary study outcome: composite of the following bleeding complications:Neurological deterioration as a result of hemorrhage in the surgical area with cauda and/or nerve root compression.Post-surgical anemia with hemoglobin level lower than 5 mmol/l, requiring transfusion.Subcutaneous hematoma leading to wound leakage and pain higher than NRS=7.Major and/or minor hemorrhage in any other body system according to the definition of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding scale.Secondary study outcomes:Each of the individual components of the primary outcomeAbsolute mean difference in operative blood loss between the study armsThrombo-embolic-related complications:Myocardial infarctionVenous thromboembolismStrokeArterial thromboembolismFurther study outcomesAnticoagulant treatment satisfaction by the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) and general health by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Global-10) in the pre- and postoperative phase.Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatednessParticipation in this study imposes no additional risk to patients. Currently, there is no consensus on whether or not aspirin should be discontinued before cranial or spinal surgery. Currently, aspirin is typically discontinued in cranial and spinal surgery, because of a potential increased risk of hemorrhagic complication. An argument not based on a clinical trial. However, this policy might delay surgical procedures or carry the risk of resulting in an increase in cardiac and neurologic thrombotic perioperative events. It is unclear if the possibility of an increase in hemorrhage-related complications outweighs the risk of an increase in cardiac and neurologic thrombotic perioperative events.Furthermore, the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be asked for safety analysis by monitoring the study.There are no further disadvantages to participating in this study. Outcome measurements are recorded during admission and regular outpatient visits, and thus, do not require additional visits to the hospital.

First-in-human Study With LIS1, a Next-generation Porcine Low Immunogenicity Antilymphocyte Immunoglobulin in Kidney Transplantation.

Polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulins (ATGs) are commonly used in organ transplantation as induction. Anti-N-glycolylneuraminic acid carbohydrate antibodies which develop in response to rabbit carbohydrate antigens might lead to unwanted systemic inflammation. LIS1, the first new generation of antilymphocyte globulins (ALGs) derived from double knockout swine, lacking carbohydrate xenoantigens was already tested in nonhuman primates and rodent models. This open-label, single-site, dose escalation, first-in-human, phase 1 study evaluated the safety, T cell depletion, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of LIS1. In an ascending dose cohort (n = 5), a primary kidney transplant recipient at low immunologic risk (panel reactive antibody [PRA] < 20%), received LIS1 for 5 d at either 0.6, 1, 3, 6, or 8 mg/kg. After each patient completed treatment, the data safety monitoring board approved respective dose escalation. In the therapeutic dose cohort (n = 5) in patients with PRA <50% without donor specific antibodies, 2 patients received 8 mg/kg and 3 patients 10 mg/kg. CD3+ T cell depletion <100/mm3 at day 2 was observed in all patients who received 6, 8, and 10 mg/kg of LIS1. The terminal half-life of LIS1 was 33.7 d with linearity in its disposition. Lymphocyte repopulation was fast and pretransplant lymphocyte subpopulation counts recovered within 2-4 wk. LIS1 was well tolerated, neither cytokine release syndrome nor severe thrombocytopenia or leukopenia were noticed. Antibodies to LIS1 were not detected. In this first-in-human trial, genome-edited swine-derived polyclonal LIS1 ALG was well tolerated, did not elicit antidrug antibodies, and caused time-limited T cell depletion in low- and medium-risk kidney transplant recipients.

Improving safety and preventing falls using an evidence-based, front-line staff huddling practice: protocol for a pragmatic trial to increase quality of care in State Veterans Homes

IntroductionFalls in nursing homes are a major cause for decreases in residents’ quality of life and overall health. This study aims to reduce resident falls by implementing the LOCK Falls...

Phase I/II clinical trial of regorafenib plus durvalumab (MEDI4736) in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced biliary tract cancers.

TPS581 Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous group of cancers affecting the epithelial lining of the intra- and extrahepatic portions of the biliary tree, ranking as the second most prevalent primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. A subgroup of BTC was found to have an abundant tumor specific neoantigen expression, enriched expression of immune related genes and genes regulating inhibitory immune checkpoint proteins. Recent advancements in BTC treatment include the TOPZ-1 trial, which established the survival advantage of adding durvalumab to the gemzar + cisplatin regimen with an estimated 24-month overall survival rate of 24.9% versus 10.4% for placebo. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival favored durvalumab at 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; P=0.001). Objective response rates also showed improvement, with 26.7% for durvalumab and 18.7% for placebo. Furthermore, single agent regorafenib has exhibited efficacy in patients with refractory advanced metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, particularly in terms of progression-free survival, favoring regorafenib over placebo, the overall toxicity profile was as expected. Regorafenib targets multiple tyrosine kinases and has been reported to show immunomodulatory properties that may counteract tumor-induced immunosuppression, providing a rationale for combining it with checkpoint inhibitors. We believe that modulating the tumor microenvironment with small molecule inhibitors like regorafenib will have synergistic effect when combined with checkpoint-based immunotherapy like durvalumab in patients with chemo refractory BTC. Methods: This study comprises a single-arm, unblinded Phase I/II trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination therapy involving regorafenib and durvalumab in patients with chemo-refractory advanced BTC. The Phase I portion employed a 3 + 3 design with two dose levels of regorafenib (80 mg and 120 mg) administered in conjunction with 1500 mg IV durvalumab every 28 days. Phase I successfully completed, and the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) endorsed the continuation of the trial as planned. Eligibility: Histologically confirmed unresectable or metastatic disease. Progressed on at least one line of therapy. May have received checkpoint inhibitor in the past. Inclusion criteria also include ECOG PS 0-1. Objectives:Primary Phase I: Safety of regorafenib in combination with durvalumab.Phase II: Progression-free survival (PFS).Secondary:Disease Control Rate (DCR), Overall response rate (ORR), Overall survival (OS). Statistical Plan: Interim futility testing after one year, halting if conditional power &lt; 20%. Final analysis: PFS and OS via Weibull Regression. Enrollment is currently ongoing with 8 out of 40 patients enrolled.

Aggregate IND Safety Reporting for Smaller Companies and Programs.

The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational New Drug (IND) Final Rule (US FDA, Final rule: Investigational new drug safety reporting requirements for human drug and biological products and safety reporting requirements for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies in humans, 2010) applies to all human drugs and biological products being studied under an IND. The Final Rule specifies that a sponsor must file an IND safety report for any Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR) of a medicinal product being investigated. To make a proper SUSAR classification, sponsors need to go beyond conventional Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) with an interdisciplinary effort, using all relevant data (including data outside clinical trials), to make judgments on the possibility of serious adverse events being caused by the study drug-rather than the underlying condition of the patient or a concomitant therapy. Ball et al. (Ball et al. in Ther Innov Regul Sci 55:705-716, 2021) have reported on how the Final Rule has been implemented by large pharmaceutical companies. This paper explores the experiences of small sponsor companies regarding the Final Rule, to understand the current challenges that they have been facing to meet aggregate IND safety reporting requirements.

No additional risk of congenital anomalies after first-trimester dydrogesterone use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Is exposure to dydrogesterone a risk factor for congenital anomalies when given in the first trimester for recurrent/threatened pregnancy loss or as luteal support in assisted reproductive technology (ART)? Dydrogesterone, when given in the first trimester for recurrent/threatened pregnancy loss or as luteal support in ART, is not a relevant additional risk factor for congenital anomalies. Despite large clinical trials and meta-analyses that show no association between dydrogesterone and congenital anomalies, some recently retracted publications have postulated an association with teratogenicity. Dydrogesterone is also often rated as less safe than bioidentical progestins. A systematic review was conducted according to a pre-specified protocol with searches on Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov. The search was limited to human studies, with no restrictions on language, geographical region, or date. The search algorithm used a PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome)-style approach combining both simple search terms and medical subject heading terms. As congenital anomalies are mostly reported as secondary outcomes, the search term 'safety' was added. Interventional study and observational study (OS) designs were eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were: women >17 years old treated for threatened miscarriage, recurrent pregnancy loss, and/or ART; the use of dydrogesterone in the first trimester compared with placebo, no treatment or other interventions; and reporting of congenital anomalies in newborns or infants ≤12 months old (primary outcome). Two authors (A.K., M.R.N.) independently extracted the following data: general study information, study population details, intervention and comparator(s), and frequencies of congenital anomalies (classification, time of determination, and type). Risk of bias focused on the reporting of congenital malformations and was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Version 2 or the ROBINS-I tool. The GRADEproGDT platform was used to generate the GRADE summary of findings table. Of the 897 records retrieved during the literature search, 47 were assessed for eligibility. Nine studies were included in the final analysis: six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three OSs. Among the RCTs, three had a low risk and three a high risk of bias. Two of the OSs were considered to have a serious risk of bias and one with critical risk of bias and was excluded for the evidence syntheses. The eight remaining studies included a total of 5070 participants and 2680 live births from 16 countries. In the meta-analysis of RCTs only, the overall risk ratio (RR) was 0.92 [95% CI 0.55; 1.55] with low certainty. When the two OSs were included, the overall RR was 1.11 [95% CI 0.73; 1.68] with low certainty. The studies included in the analysis do not report congenital anomalies as the primary outcome; reporting of congenital anomalies was often not standardized. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis provide clear reassurance to both clinicians and patients that dydrogesterone is not associated with congenital anomalies above the rate that might be expected due to environmental and genetic factors. The results of this work represent the highest current level of evidence for the question of congenital anomalies, which removes the existing uncertainty caused by poor quality and retracted studies. Editorial support was provided by Highfield Communication Consultancy, Oxford, UK, sponsored by Abbott Products Operations AG, Allschwil, Switzerland. A.K., J.A.G.-V., L.P.S., J.N.v.d.A., and J.F.S. received honoraria from Abbott for preparation and participation in an advisory board. J.A.G.-V. received grants and lecture fees from Merck, Organon, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, and Theramex. M.R.N. has no conflicts of interest. J.N.v.d.A. and J.A.G.-V. have no other conflicts of interest. A.K. received payment from Abbott for a talk at the IVF Worldwide congress on 22 September 2023. J.F.S. has received grants from the National Institutes of Health, royalties/licences from Elsevier and Prescient Medicine (SOLVD Health), consulting fees from Burroughs Wellcome Fund (BWF) and Bayer, honoraria from Magee Women's Research Institute, Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre, University of Kansas and Oakridge National Research Laboratory, Agile, Daiichi Sankyo/American Regent, and Bayer, and travel support to attend meetings for the International Academy of Human Reproduction (IAHR). J.F.S. has patents related to diagnosis and treatment of PCOS and prediction of preterm birth. J.F.S. participates on advisory boards for SOLVD Health, Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre, and FHI360, was the past President board member of the Society for Reproductive Investigation, has a leadership role for the following organizations: Scientific Advisory Board, SOLVD Health, EAB Chair for contraceptive technology initiative, FHI360, EAB member, Wisconsin National Primate Research Centre, Advisory Board for MWRI Summit, Chair of BWF NextGen Pregnancy Research Panel, Medical Executive Committee at the Howard, and Georgeanna Jones Foundation, and is Vice President, IAHR. L.P.S. has received consulting fees from Shield Pharmaceuticals, Scynexis, Organon, Natera, Celula China, AiVF, Agile, Daiichi Sankyo, American Regent, and Medicem, honoraria from Agile, Daiichi Sankyo/American Regent, and Bayer, and travel support from BD Diagnostics. L.P.S. participates on the data safety monitoring board for Astellas and is a Chair of DSMB for fezolinetant. Abbott played no role in the funding of the study or in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022356977.

Safety and Efficacy of Axatilimab at 3 Different Doses in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (AGAVE-201)

Disclosures Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is an immune-mediated complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) that affects multiple organs with inflammatory and fibrotic pathology, leading to significant patient burden and mortality. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R)-dependent monocytes and macrophages play a key role in cGVHD inflammation and fibrosis. Axatilimab (SNDX-6352) is an investigational, high-affinity anti-CSF-1R monoclonal antibody that targets monocytes and macrophages. We previously demonstrated the biological and clinical activity of axatilimab with organ-specific responses and symptom improvement in a phase 1/2 study (NCT03604692) in patients with cGVHD. Methods: This pivotal phase 2, open-label, randomized, multicenter study evaluated axatilimab at 3 different doses in alloHCT patients with recurrent or refractory cGVHD (AGAVE-201; NCT04710576). Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive intravenous (IV) axatilimab at 0.3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W), 1 mg/kg Q2W, or 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W). Randomization was stratified by severity of cGVHD and prior use of ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, or belumosudil. Concomitant use of corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus or everolimus) was allowed. Axatilimab treatment could be continued as long as there was clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in the first 6 cycles (24 weeks) as defined by the NIH 2014 consensus criteria; the efficacy boundary of the ORR is based on the lower bound of the 95% CI exceeding 30%. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients reporting a clinically significant reduction of symptoms, as measured by the modified Lee Symptom Scale (mLSS) score with a threshold of ≥7 points. Safety endpoints included frequency and severity of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: A total of 241 patients were enrolled across 121 study sites and 239 (99.2%) patients were treated with axatilimab at the data cutoff of 7 April 2023. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy, including ruxolitinib (74%), belumosudil (23%), and ibrutinib (31%). Demographics and disease characteristics were balanced among the 3 dose cohorts (Table 1). ORR (95% CI) was 74% (63, 83) with 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 67% (55, 77) with 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 50% (39, 61) with 3 mg/kg Q4W (Table 1). Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached in any of the cohorts, with 60%, 60% and 53% of patients maintaining response at 12 months in the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 3 mg/kg Q4W dose cohorts, respectively. Clinical benefit, as measured by reduction in mLSS score, was reported in 55%, 54%, and 36% of patients in the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 3 mg/kg Q4W cohorts, respectively, in the first 6 cycles. Drug discontinuation owing to TEAEs occurred in 6% of patients with 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 22% with 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 18% with 3 mg/kg Q4W. The most common TEAEs are summarized in Table 2. Fatal TEAEs occurred in 1.3%, 8.6%, and 7.6% of patients in the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W, 1 mg/kg Q2W, and 3 mg/kg Q4W dose cohorts, respectively. The frequency of TRAEs and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were dose dependent, consistent with CSF-1R inhibition-mediated macrophage clearance. Most infections were mild, with 3 reported cytomegalovirus infections, including reactivations, in the higher dose cohorts. Conclusions: The AGAVE-201 pivotal trial met its primary endpoint for all doses studied. Axatilimabtreatment of refractory cGVHD in heavily pretreated patients resulted in robust clinical activity and durable responses in all 3 dose cohorts, with the highest ORR and least toxicity at the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W dose. Adverse events consisted primarily of transient laboratory abnormalities and other on-target effects known to be associated with CSF-1R block. Wolff: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mallickrodt: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Behring: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Cutler:Sanofi: Consultancy; Ruth L. Kirschstein Postdoctoral Individual National Research Service Award: Research Funding; Allovir: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB); Pluristem Therapeutics: Other: DSMB; InhibRx: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Oxford Immune Algorithmics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cimeio: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Amgen, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Kadmon, Pfizer, Syndax: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Steering Committee member; Janssen: Other: Study medication provider; Equillium, Kadmon, Mallinckrodt: Consultancy. Pusic:Incyte: Honoraria; Syndax: Honoraria. White:Novartis: Honoraria. Hamadani:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Caribou: Consultancy; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; SeaGen: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Myeloid Therapeutics: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; CRISPR: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; ADC therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Salhotra:Gilead: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; OrcaBio: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Rigel Pharma: Research Funding; Sobi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Research Funding. Choe:Opna: Other: Receipt of equipment, materials, drugs to institution, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Receipt of equipment, materials, drugs to institution; MJH Life Sciences: Honoraria; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; NIH National Cancer Institute: Research Funding. Kwon:Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Bermúdez:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfitzer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radojcic:Syndax: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. O’Toole:Syndax: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tian:Incyte: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Ordentlich:Syndax: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents &amp; Royalties: Patents assigned to Syndax Pharmaceuticals. DeFilipp:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Regimmune: Research Funding; Taiho Oncology: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Inhibrx: Consultancy; PharmaBiome AG: Consultancy; Ono Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Kitko:Horizon: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Figure 1

Updated Protocol for the Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Lex-210 Study of Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients with Acute Major Bleeding on Factor Xa Inhibitor Therapy

Background and Significance: Despite significantly reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared with vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulant therapy with factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) is associated with similar incidences of other major bleeds. Although hemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are often used (off-label), the efficacy and safety of PCCs for managing FXaI-related bleeding requires further investigation. This study aims to evaluate superior hemostatic efficacy of high-dose vs low-dose four-factor (4F) PCC (Octaplex®; Octapharma) in adults with FXaI-related major bleeding. Study Design and Methods: LEX-210 (NCT04867837) is a Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, group-sequential, parallel-group, adaptive design study. Significant modifications have recently been made to the study design. Patients aged ≥18 years with acute major bleeding (e.g., gastrointestinal, intracranial) and baseline anti-factor Xa activity of ≥100 ng/mL are eligible. To increase rate of recruiting suitable patients into the study, the eligibility criteria have been optimized. For inclusion (full criteria in Table 1), baseline anti-factor Xa activity of ≥100 ng/mL may be either confirmed by locally available tests (including retrospectively by the central laboratory) or suspected by the investigator and later confirmed by the central lab. Prospective written informed consent will be obtained from all patients or patients' legally authorized representative prior to enrolment. If this is not possible, in countries outside the US where it is permitted under local regulations or approved by local ethics committees, deferred consent procedures may be applied. Key exclusion criteria (Table 2) include acute trauma for which FXaI reversal alone would not be expected to control bleeding, and thromboembolic events in the last 3 months. In addition, hypersensitivity to heparin and platelet inhibitors are specified. Patients will be excluded if they score &amp;lt;7 on the Glasgow Coma Scale (with allowances for intubation), or have expected survival of &amp;lt;24 hours. While patients scheduled for surgery in &amp;lt;12 hours are excluded, minor surgeries and invasive procedures for diagnostic or therapeutic reasons are allowed, or if intended to address a second (non-index) bleeding event. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to 50 or 15 IU/kg 4F-PCC. The primary objective is to demonstrate superior hemostatic efficacy of the higher dose in patients with major bleeding associated with FXaI. Hemostatic efficacy through 24 hours after receipt of 4F-PCC will be evaluated by an independent data monitoring and endpoint adjudication committee using objective criteria, with a binary outcome of effective or ineffective. Secondary endpoints include change in endogenous thrombin potential (baseline to 1 hour after 4F-PCC), 30-day rates of thromboembolic events, and all-cause mortality. The study is conducted in accordance with the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki The proportion of patients with an effective outcome will be compared between groups using a one-sided z-test. The primary statistical model will be adjusted for the baseline anti-factor Xa activity as determined retrospectively by the central laboratory. A logistic regression model for the success rate using treatment group (dose level) and the anti-factor Xa activity as fixed effects will be used to determine the one-sided z-statistic. LEX-210 launched in Q4 2021 and will be performed across ~60 sites in North America and the European Continent. Target enrollment is ~260 patients, assuming a 30% dropout rate. So far, 26 sites in the US, Italy, Germany, and Spain have been initiated, with 5 patients enrolled. Study completion is anticipated in Q3 2024.

CTNI-35. A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF BERUBICIN VS. LOMUSTINE AFTER FIRST-LINE THERAPY FOR GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (GBM): INTERIM RESULTS OF A PRE-PLANNED ANALYSIS OF OVERALL SURVIVAL (OS)

Abstract Berubicin is an analog of doxorubicin (Dox) that appears to cross the BBB with significant central nervous system (CNS) uptake. RESULTS: of a Phase 1 dose-escalation study with 25 patients evaluable for efficacy showed 1 complete response (14+ years), 1 partial response durable for 12 weeks, and 9 patients with stable disease for a clinical benefit rate of 44%. Our current, potentially pivotal trial for patients with recurrent GBM after first-line therapy is enrolling in the US and Europe. It is unique in that all patients must be Grade 4 IDH WT, classifying these tumors as a poorer prognostic population than Grade 4 IDH mutated. Patients are randomized in a 2:1 design of Berubicin:Lomustine and stratified by MGMT methylation status. The primary endpoint is OS. Data has been presented showing that Berubicin and Lomustine arms are balanced with respect to MGMT status and demographics, with relatively comparable safety profiles (SNO Annual Meeting 2022 Abstract #383142). A pre-planned non-binding futlity analysis of the primary endpoint, OS, is being evaluated when the trial reaches ~30% of expected events (44 events). The interim analysis will be performed by an independent statistician under the supervision of the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The futility analysis will be based on the conditional power that the trial will be positive (e.g., statistically significant difference between treatment groups’ OS). If the conditional power is &amp;lt;10% then the DSMB may recommend to end the study; otherwise the study will continue as it is currently planned. The review will also include safety and secondary efficacy endpoint summaries. RESULTS: of this interim analysis will be available for the SNO annual meeting and an evaluation of its outcome will be performed, with conclusions and recommendations for the further development of Berubicin as a therapeutic option for patients with recurrent GBM.

Pembrolizumab with or Without Lenvatinib as First-line Therapy for Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (LEAP-011): A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

BackgroundPembrolizumab plus lenvatinib has shown antitumor activity and acceptable safety in patients with platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC). ObjectiveTo evaluate pembrolizumab plus either lenvatinib or placebo as first-line therapy for advanced UC in the phase 3 LEAP-011 study. Design, setting, and participantsPatients with advanced UC who were ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy or any platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. InterventionPatients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 wk plus either lenvatinib 20 mg or placebo orally once daily. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisDual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). An external data monitoring committee (DMC) regularly reviewed safety and efficacy data every 3 mo. Results and limitationsBetween June 25, 2019 and July 21, 2021, 487 patients were allocated to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n = 245) or placebo plus pembrolizumab (n = 242). The median time from randomization to the data cutoff date (July 26, 2021) was 12.8 mo (interquartile range, 6.9–19.3). The median PFS was 4.5 mo in the combination arm and 4.0 mo in the pembrolizumab arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.72–1.14]). The median OS was 11.8 mo for the combination arm and 12.9 mo for the pembrolizumab arm (HR 1.14 [95% CI 0.87–1.48]). Grade 3–5 adverse events attributed to trial treatment occurred in 123 of 241 patients (51%) treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and in 66 of 242 patients (27%) treated with placebo plus pembrolizumab. This trial was terminated earlier than initially planned based on recommendation from the DMC. ConclusionsThe benefit-to-risk ratio for first-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was not considered favorable versus pembrolizumab plus placebo as first-line therapy in patients with advanced UC. Patient summaryLenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was not more effective than pembrolizumab plus placebo in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

MD Anderson Phase III Randomized Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) vs. Postoperative SRS for Brain Metastases Trial

Postoperative stereotactic radiation therapy/radiosurgery (SRT/SRS) is being evaluated in comparison to Preoperative SRT for brain metastases (mets) in a limited number of prospective clinical trials. Our objective is to address the significant knowledge gap concerning the logistics of preoperative SRT in comparison to postoperative SRT in a randomized controlled study. Patients with brain mets with at least 1 surgically operable met were randomized (1:1) to Preop vs Postop SRT. In this abstract, we present non-primary endpoint data on the trial concept and logistics of treatment for this data safety monitoring board reviewed study. Patients enrolled had 1-2 lesions resected and <15 lesions treated at time of SRT to best reflect the standard population that receive SRT and surgery at our institution. From 12/2018 to 12/2022, 99 patients with 1-2 operable brain mets were enrolled and randomized to Preop (n = 49) or Postop (n = 50) SRT. Males represented 56% of the cohort compared to females, and <25% were age 18-49 years, while 27%, 29, and 19% respectively were 50-59, 60-69, and > = 70. The most frequent histologies enrolled were lung (29%), renal cell (15%), melanoma (14%), and breast (11%) cancers. The majority of patients (83%) had 1-4 brain mets on their baseline MRI and 91% subsequently had a single lesion resected. Seventy-nine patients completed both SRT and surgery, while 9% received no therapy due to drop out before study therapy initiation. Among patients receiving both therapies in the combined cohort, 68% received a non-invasive stereotactic radiosurgery instrument to the randomized cavity lesion compared to 32% receiving LINAC based SRT. Treatment of the lesion or cavity with single fraction SRT was 51% in the Preop arm vs 31% in the Postop arm. Multi-fraction (3-5 SRT) was 67% in the Postop cohort in contrast to 47% in the Preop cohort. Time from randomization to RT was 5.6 days and 33.7 days in the Preop and Postop cohorts respectively, and for surgery was 10.2 days vs 12.9 days in the Postop vs Preop cohorts. The average time from RT to surgery was 7.3 days in the Preop arm and 23.5 days in the Postop arm (to allow for incisional healing time). In one of the early initiated randomized prospective cohorts of Preop vs Postop SRT, we demonstrated logistical feasibility with an efficient clinical trial workflow for study treatment. Differences in Preop vs Postop logistics reflect clinical practice differences in time-to-treatment. Therapy with various modalities reflected real-world practice and possibly provider preferences in technique when addressing the nature of delineating cavities and changes in cavity volume with regard to fractionation. Independent of the primary outcomes, our data provides insights in the practical management of patients receiving these two modalities of therapy, and further data at the completion of trial will address relevant primary outcomes.

EMBIO trial study protocol: left gastric artery embolisation for weight loss in patients living with obesity with a BMI 35–50 kg/m2

IntroductionLeft gastric artery embolisation (LGAE) is a well-established treatment for major upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding when control is not established via upper GI endoscopy and recently has shown promising results...

Hydroxychloroquine in Stage 1 Type 1 Diabetes.

Innate immune responses may be involved in the earliest phases of type 1 diabetes (T1D). To test whether blocking innate immaune cells modulated progression of the disease, we randomly assigned 273 individuals with stage 1 T1D to treatment with hydroxychloroquine (n = 183; 5 mg/kg per day to a maximum of 400 mg) or placebo (n = 90) and assessed whether hydroxychloroquine treatment delayed or prevented progression to stage 2 T1D (i.e., two or more islet autoantibodies with abnormal glucose tolerance). After a median follow-up of 23.3 months, the trial was stopped prematurely by the data safety monitoring board because of futility. There were no safety concerns in the hydroxychloroquine arm, including in annual ophthalmologic examinations. Preplanned secondary analyses showed a transient decrease in the glucose average area under the curve to oral glucose in the hydroxychloroquine-treated arm at month 6 and reduced titers of anti-GAD and anti-insulin autoantibodies and acquisition of positive autoantibodies in the hydroxychloroquine arm (P = 0.032). We conclude that hydroxychloroquine does not delay progression to stage 2 T1D in individuals with stage 1 disease. Drug treatment reduces the acquisition of additional autoantibodies and the titers of autoantibodies to GAD and insulin.

Abstract P2145: A Review Of Trends In Cardiovascular Medicine Clinical Trials; 2012-2021

Introduction: We examine cardiovascular medicine clinical trials (CTs) from the United States over the past decade focusing on characteristics that are important for assessing the reliability of evidence derived from them. Methods: The Clinicaltrials.gov API interface was queried with a comprehensive search strategy to identify trials in the field of cardiovascular medicine from the US registered from 1/1/2012 till the 12/31/2021. We extracted data on the presence of data monitoring committees (DMC), masking status and allocation methods used in the CTs. Results: Our initial query identified 1299 CTs. After reviewing and excluding unrelated trials, 536 were found to be cardiovascular medicine CTs. Of these, 507 (95%) reported if they had a DMC or not, 261 (49%) reported having a DMC while 246 (46%) reported not having one. 471 (88%) CTs reported on their design allocation method, most common being randomized as reported by 312 (58%) of the trials, 43 (8%) were non-randomized and 116 (22%) reported that a design allocation was not applicable to them. 471 (88%) CTs reported on their masking status, most common being open label as seen in 247 (46%) of the trials followed by double masking seen in 71 (13%) of the trials. On performing a Cox and Stuart trend test, no trend was seen in the annual proportion of trials with randomization, a DMC or masking over the past decade [P &gt; 0.05 for all three]. Conclusions: In these analyses of 536 CTs, we found that &gt; 50% did not have a DMC or any masking and no favorable trend was seen in the annual proportion of same over the past decade. Additionally, majority of the trials reported randomization as the design allocation method.

Recombinant von Willebrand factor and tranexamic acid for heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with mild and moderate von Willebrand disease in the USA (VWDMin): a phase 3, open-label, randomised, crossover trial

Heavy menstrual bleeding occurs in 80% of women with von Willebrand disease and is associated with iron deficiency and poor response to current therapies. International guidelines indicate low certainty regarding effectiveness of hormonal therapy and tranexamic acid. Although von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrate is approved for bleeds, no prospective trials guide its use in heavy menstrual bleeding. We aimed to compare recombinant VWF with tranexamic acid for reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with von Willebrand disease. VWDMin, a phase 3, open-label, randomised crossover trial, was done in 13 haemophilia treatment centres in the USA. Female patients aged 13-45 years with mild or moderate von Willebrand disease, defined as VWF ristocetin cofactor less than 0·50 IU/mL, and heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as a pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) score more than 100 in one of the past two cycles were eligible for enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to two consecutive cycles each of intravenous recombinant VWF, 40 IU/kg over 5-10 min on day 1, and oral tranexamic acid 1300 mg three times daily on days 1-5, the order determined by randomisation. The primary outcome was a 40-point reduction in PBAC score by day 5 after two cycles of treatment. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients with any post-baseline PBAC scores. The trial was stopped early due to slow recruitment on Feb 15, 2022, by a data safety monitoring board request, and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02606045. Between Feb 12, 2019, and Nov 16, 2021, 39 patients were enrolled, 36 of whom completed the trial (17 received recombinant VWF then tranexamic acid and 19 received tranexamic acid then recombinant VWF). At the time of this unplanned interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 27, 2022), median follow-up was 23·97 weeks (IQR 21·81-28·14). The primary endpoint was not met, neither treatment corrected PBAC score to the normal range. Median PBAC score was significantly lower after two cycles with tranexamic acid than with recombinant VWF (146 [95% CI 117-199] vs 213 [152-298]; adjusted mean treatment difference 46 [95% CI 2-90]; p=0·039). There were no serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths and no grade 3-4 adverse events. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events were mucosal bleeding (four [6%] patients during tranexamic acid treatment vs zero during recombinant VWF treatment) and other bleeding (four [6%] vs two [3%]). These interim data suggest that recombinant VWF is not superior to tranexamic acid in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding in patients with mild or moderate von Willebrand disease. These findings support discussion of treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding with patients based on their preferences and lived experience. National Heart Lung Blood Institute (National Institutes of Health).